This research synthesis is the first in a series that will examine
key issues in the field of family and community connections with
schools. This report identifies key issues that must be addressed
if research is to assist schools, families, and communities in working
together to nurture high standards and academic success for all
students. Existing research has shown that family and community
connections with schools can make a significant contribution to
improving schools and student success; however, not enough is known
about these connections to fully inform practice.
There are many reasons why the research issues presented in this
synthesis must be addressed. First, the field is moving forward
and work is being done without the research-based knowledge desirable
to support the work. As one researcher said, Connections between
schools and other organizations are being formed at a rate that
has caused action on them to outstrip knowledge about them
(Wynn, J., Meyer, S., & Richards-Schuster, K., 2000, p. 4).
Second, despite some promising models and growing evidence of the
benefits of connections, policymakers, funding agencies, school
systems, and state education agencies are still not demonstrating
maximum support for connection-building practice. These stakeholders
are asking for more research and evidence about the effectiveness
of family and community connections with schools.
Finally, many authors reviewed noted that much of the evidence
of the impact of connections is hidden; that is, results
are not published or widely distributed. Some of these unpublished
evaluations suggest that certain connections programs, such as community
schools and School-to-Work, have had success in improving student
outcomes and are viable school reform strategies (Dryfoos, 2000;
Hughes, Bailey & Mechur, 2001). These efforts must be further
studied and the results more widely disseminated so that a solid
research base for supporting school-community connections can be
built.
The objective of this document is to reflect research issues that
have emerged from our review of recent literature, not to advocate
for particular solutions or models. We have provided a variety of
perspectives and potential solutions in order to increase awareness
for all stakeholders involved. In most cases, further research and
debate is needed to clarify issues and possible solutions.
After reviewing and examining a body of literature that included
more than 160 publications, four key issues emerged:
1. Clarifying the concept of family and community
connections with schools
2. Measuring the outcomes of family and community
connections with schools
3. Advancing the research base for family and community
connections with schools
4. Addressing critical areas for research in family
and community connections with schools
This document is divided into four sections that explore each of
the issues above. Clarifying the Concept of Family
and Community Connections with Schools presents the first issue.
In it we discuss what is meant by the term family and community
connections with schools and the challenges that arise when
there are different types of connections and different perceptions
about the roles of stakeholders. We explore the tendency to focus
research and practice on school-directed initiatives, due to the
natural advantage schools have over other stakeholders and the policy
structures that support it. We then present the need to expand our
paradigm of the concept to include definitions that go beyond programs,
to draw from theories outside the field of education, and to consider
culturally-appropriate and family-centered definitions.
The second section, Measuring the Outcomes of
Family and Community Connections with Schools, describes the
variety of outcomes associated with different types of connections
and the implications for various stakeholders: schools, students,
families, and the community. This section explains that the relationships
between family and community connections and specific outcomes are
not always direct or clear. It then presents the need for more appropriate
measurements and indicators of these connections, such as measuring
intermediate variables and mediating factors between connections
and outcomes, and for measuring the very process of building and
maintaining connections in addition to the outcomes.
The third section, Advancing the Research Base
for Family and Community Connections with Schools, points out
the current early state of the research and what is needed to develop
a solid research base. It reviews the importance of further developing
theories and conceptual models and conducting rigorous research
in this field.
Finally, the fourth section, Addressing Critical
Areas for Research in Family and Community Connections with Schools,
highlights seven areas that warrant more research. Within each of
these areas, both promising directions (new thinking and research
that hold promise and can serve as a basis for future work) and
research needs (areas in which research is inconclusive or contradictory)
are identified. The seven key areas are: (1) forging connections
with families from culturally diverse backgrounds, (2) connecting
families with schools in homework help, (3) connecting school, family,
and community for effective school reform, (4) connecting school,
family, and community through developmental approaches and integrated
services, (5) connecting school, family, and community to support
student transitions throughout the education system, (6) developing
process-based approaches to make connections, and (7) preparing
educators and other school personnel to make connections between
schools, families, and communities.
While this report attempts to be fair and inclusive, time and space
limitations prevent us from treating several important topics to
the extent that we would like. In fact, there are four topics that
require more thorough study, and these will be treated separately
in subsequent annual research syntheses to be conducted by the Center.
The 2002 synthesis will investigate growing evidence that family
and community connections with schools make a difference in student
achievement and success. Next, the 2003 synthesis will focus on
the topic of connecting families from diverse backgrounds with schools.
We will examine the links between families, communities, and schools
in linguistically and culturally diverse populations as well as
the extensive work now addressing special needs populations and
systems of care. In 2004, the synthesis will look at what research
says about involving community organizations in the process of transforming
schools into high-performing learning communities. Finally, in 2005,
the topic will be connecting families and schools to support successful
student transitions throughout the education system. Taken together,
we intend that these five syntheses provide a view that is broad
and deep, thoroughly examining critical issues and offering a meaningful
tool for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners.
The current emphasis on high standards and accountability in education
requires a sound research agenda for this field that examines the
evidence of its impact on student achievement and school improvement.
At the same time, authors and researchers are interested in the
broader outcomes of these connections, due both to their inherent
value and their possible link to academic achievement. Researchers
are also attempting to generate process information, such as how
to develop connections or how to identify the factors that make
connections possible, and ultimately impact student achievement
or broader outcomes.
Ultimately, a strong research agenda for family and community connections
with schools must include a clear and multifaceted picture of what
these connections are, their benefits and limitations, and how different
stakeholders can be involved. A sound research base will help practitioners
envision and implement connections that will become part of the
everyday environment of schools, homes, and communities. What is
emerging from this synthesis of the literature is just such a research
agenda for the field, one that will benefit and inform theoretical
development, policy, and practice, and that will support student
success in school and beyond.
|